Canalplan Bug Tracker
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0000320||Canalplan||[All Projects] Bug||public||2017-09-06 12:07||2017-09-14 07:25|
|Assigned To||Nick Atty|
|Product Version||Product Build|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version|
|Summary||0000320: Mooring Ratings|
|Description||The "Rate mooring" option fails to reappear after a change is made.|
Should this be only available at an visitors mooring. Isn't moorings at locks discouraged except for waiting, yet we have had moorings at locks rated as "impossible". [Muscot Mill Bridge No 18] is rated as "impossible" yet the map show moored boats.
Should fixed structures (bridges, lock, narrows etc) have a wording "Moorings close to this place are ....."
|Tags||No tags attached.|
Peter Stockdale (reporter)
|This option is available (and works), to those not logged in. Is this wise ?|
Stephen Atty (administrator)
|I've flagged this up to Nick already...|
Nick Atty (administrator)
The mooring code went live a bit sooner than it really should so that I could get some other changes live before we started on new logons and further https work on beta.
For mooring data to be any use it needs to be much more comprehensive, so I wanted to make it very easy to add and obvious. Also since most places had no ratings at all the idea of accumulating and averaging star ratings was never going to work.
The next release will let them be edited through the normal route (so, like access, you can set from nothing easily but subsequent change is a bit more complicated) and add a one-liner.
I think it's fine for bridges to have moorings - I really don't want dozens and dozens of places called "bit of piling you can moor to just west of bridge 17", I'd much rather have bridge 17 marked as an OK mooring with a comment "Moor on piling just to the west".
And I definitely don't want to encourage the CRT and previously BW policy of herding us onto their formal moorings as an excuse not to dredge anywhere else!
Nick Atty (administrator)
|I'm content with how it's working. The next release will prevent some slightly strange messages getting into the change log when a place is created and first edited, but that's about tidiness - the functionality is now fine and is being used I'm pleased to say.|
|2017-09-06 12:07||Shultzy||New Issue|
|2017-09-06 12:43||Peter Stockdale||Note Added: 0001268|
|2017-09-06 18:43||Stephen Atty||Assigned To||=> Nick Atty|
|2017-09-06 18:43||Stephen Atty||Status||new => assigned|
|2017-09-06 18:44||Stephen Atty||Note Added: 0001269|
|2017-09-07 07:58||Nick Atty||Note Added: 0001270|
|2017-09-14 07:25||Nick Atty||Status||assigned => resolved|
|2017-09-14 07:25||Nick Atty||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2017-09-14 07:25||Nick Atty||Note Added: 0001277|